Skip to main content

Irini Georgi

Irini Georgi

Menu

Tag: dating

What does feminist dating coaching mean in practice?

What is feminist dating coaching

If you’re wondering what feminism has to do with dating, and why I offer dating coaching while constantly talking about patriarchy on social media, I’ll explain it briefly here.

The way we behave in dating, in relationships with the opposite sex, and in our romantic lives more generally, reflects how we have learned to think and behave from a very young age, within society. It’s no coincidence that most male dating coaches talk about alpha males, PUA techniques, and how to “play the game.”

The ideas we have about masculinity and femininity, about what the “right” man and the “right” woman should be like, what the roles of each gender should be, and how the dynamics between them should work, have a profound impact on our relationships. And, of course, there is the idea that men want (and should want) sex, while women want (and should want) relationships.

Messaging & Approach

A sexist approach can be apparent from the very first messages on dating apps or social media, and from the very first lines used in real life.

That’s why I teach my male clients, men who want and are trying to be good men, how to put themselves in a woman’s shoes, what the female experience is like, how a woman might think, and what she expects to see from a man, so they can understand how to send the right messages and how to make them cute, funny and interesting.

From the women’s side, I teach them how to identify and recognise problematic rhetorical patterns in men’s messages or words that may conceal sexism or problematic behaviours. I very often see women ignoring signs, or not noticing them at all, that are screaming danger or a values gap from a mile away. And sometimes I explain why a message they didn’t like, without knowing exactly why, was actually sexist.

The Date

There are dozens of small situations and behaviors on a date that are influenced by patriarchy, and it’s not just about “who pays.”

It’s about how the suggestion of where and how you’ll go is made, where you’ll meet, what exactly you’ll do during the date, whether it will be coffee, drinks, dinner or another activity, what time you’ll go and what time you’ll return, whether you’ll go for a walk, and of course, physical proximity and touching during the date.

Communication & Connection

Under patriarchy, men are taught to talk about themselves and not listen, or show much curiosity about a woman’s life, while women are taught the opposite.

Here, I help men develop active listening skills, as well as learn to ask clarifying questions. The focus needs to shift from “I need to impress” to “I want to connect.”

Women, on the other hand, need to learn to focus on “I don’t just want to test him, I also want to have fun.”

Kissing & What Comes Next

The conversations I have with my clients about kissing, especially with men who carry the burden of initiating because of patriarchy, are endless.

From when the right moment is and how we know it’s the right moment, to actual technique. And then come the even more complicated questions, such as how to ask her to go home with you, when to say it and how to inspire trust from the beginning, how to make her feel comfortable, and even what your home should be like.

Sex & Pleasure

This is where consent comes in. Fortunately, I don’t have to discuss much of this with my male clients, because they know all about it. The difficult conversations happen with women and the experiences they have had, so that they can understand that they were not responsible, and then learn to recognise earlier what they don’t want to experience again, set boundaries and move forward.

At the same time, we focus on desire and expressing it, rather than using sex as part of a strategy to prevent the other person from losing interest.

Relationship Dynamics

All of this is only the beginning. Because then we move on to relationship dynamics, which are once again influenced by patriarchy.

The (supposed) sexual liberation made casual relationships and situationships possible, but it did not eliminate the inequalities within them. Because of the demands of stereotypical masculinity, men are more often unwilling to commit, wanting instead to have sex with as many people as possible without the responsibilities of relationships, while women have grown up longing for someone to choose them.

Attachment Patterns

Patriarchy is responsible for raising men who are less emotionally available than women, and often lack the emotional skills and capacity, the emotional endurance to tolerate negative feelings, and therefore the ability to give and “hold” more emotionally.

And this brings us to attachment patterns. Because men are discouraged from expressing emotions and vulnerability as they grow up, they are more likely to have avoidant tendencies, while women, who are taught that they need to earn validation, are more likely to have anxious tendencies.

Here, I introduce new perspectives and we learn new habits, so that we can move beyond the self-protective patterns that have begun to prevent us from finding happiness.

So, what does feminist dating coaching actually mean?

It’s not about learning “tricks” to make someone want you or get someone to choose you. It’s about understanding how what we have learned about gender, desire, relationships and our own worth affects the way we flirt, choose, communicate, have sex and relate to one another.

It’s about learning to recognise real danger without being afraid of every difficulty. Setting boundaries without building walls. Giving people opportunities without abandoning yourself. Being able to say “no,” but also “yes” consciously, because you genuinely want to.

And, ultimately, stopping trying to win someone’s love and starting to build relationships based on desire, freedom, reciprocity and connection.

These are just some of the things we work on together. If you want to better understand your own patterns, communicate differently, and approach dating with more self-awareness and fewer “strategic games,” fill out the form and I’ll get in touch with you directly.

Share:

What does it mean when someone does not have capacity?

It’s when someone wants you and cares about you, but they can’t. This is one of the hardest situations in relationships. Because you can see that the problem isn’t indifference. You see it when they look at you, when they show you tenderness, when you pull away and they tell you, “I missed you.” That’s why it confuses you so much.

Because someone can care about you and still not be able to. They may not have the capacity to love you consistently, long-term, in a way that makes you feel safe, in a way that allows you to relax and let go because you know they’ll be there.

Yes, they can care about you and still not be able to.

They care, but:

  • They pull away or shut down when you open up.
  • They avoid difficult conversations.
  • They shut down when there is too much emotion in the room.
  • They become defensive when you express pain or a need, interpreting it as an attack or accusation.
  • They disappear instead of sitting down and repairing the rupture.

So you’re left holding two truths:

“They love me, but they can’t give me the love I need.”

It doesn’t mean the feelings aren’t there.

But that person may only be able to be there for you in the happy moments, when the atmosphere is light. When you’re smiling, when you’re your pleasant, easygoing self, when you’re not asking for anything difficult or “too much.” When you don’t have many demands, when being with you is easy and convenient.

Not when you’re silent. Not when you’re hurting. Not when you need them to be present in the difficult, uncomfortable moment. Not when change needs to happen.

It doesn’t mean they’re a bad person. Truly, they may care about you deeply. But that doesn’t necessarily mean they have the skills, self-awareness and emotional maturity needed for a healthy relationship to thrive and be sustained.

It’s much easier to love someone in the good moments. Much harder to remain there in the not-so-good ones.

What destroys us:

The hardest relationships, the ones that destroy us the most when they end, aren’t the ones where there is no love. They’re the ones where there is love, but there is no capacity. There isn’t the ability for one person to tolerate difficult emotions and the transformative work that needs to happen within a relationship for it to work and evolve.

But because there is love, you see glimpses of the potential. Of what you could have, if only the other person could. You see the good days, the care, the effort, the tenderness, the embrace, the right words they sometimes say, and which mean everything to you. But they don’t last.

Those moments when you almost have it.

And you hope that from now on, this will be your everyday reality.

But it isn’t.

Love matters, but love alone isn’t enough. It also requires the courage to be vulnerable, accountability, repair, consistency, consistency, consistency.

Because they may care about you and love you, but they may not be able to love you in the way you need to be loved.

The tragedy of relationships is that someone can genuinely have feelings for you and still not have the capacity to choose you. These two things can coexist in the same person, and that’s what makes being involved with emotionally unavailable people so painful.

Were they “selling” you a future they never intended to give you? Maybe. But future faking implies a degree of conscious deception: someone presenting you with a future they know they have no intention of creating with you. But they may genuinely have believed everything they were telling you at the moment they were saying it. And that is actually a very common, if more complicated, version of what happens.

They may have loved you. Or they may have believed they loved you. But feelings aren’t enough. Love is a daily choice and a daily action.

And one of the hardest lessons in love is learning to stop evaluating people based on the intensity of their feelings and start evaluating them based on the clarity of their choices.

They may love you. They may miss you. But that isn’t enough. And so you grieve something that may have been emotionally real, but was never truly available as a relationship.

Because sometimes the most dangerous relationships aren’t the ones in which nothing was real. They’re the ones in which enough things were real for you to keep hoping.

And at some point, you have to stop asking:

“Did they really love me?”

The answer may be yes.

But the better question is:

“Were they actually willing and able to build a life with me?”

Believe the answer they give you with their life, not the one they occasionally send you in a message.

If you want to talk about what’s happening in your new relationship or dating situation, and how you can change the dynamics in the way you communicate with each other, so that the dynamic itself can change, I can help. Fill out the form and I’ll get in touch with you shortly.

Note on capacity

The text is written as though men are the only ones who lack capacity, even though that obviously isn’t true. However, it is true that the way men are raised within patriarchy can prevent them from developing emotional range and emotional resilience — meaning the ability to tolerate emotions, and therefore how much they are able to give and “hold” emotionally.

Share:

How trauma sabotages your love life

One of the most confusing things about trauma is that it rarely looks like “trauma” in dating.

It doesn’t always show up as flashbacks, panic attacks, or dramatic emotional breakdowns. More often, it appears quietly through patterns people repeat without understanding why: chasing emotionally unavailable partners, losing interest when someone healthy shows up, overanalyzing text messages, pulling away after intimacy, people-pleasing, shutting down emotionally, or constantly fearing abandonment.

Many people think they simply have “bad luck in love.” In reality, their nervous system has learned to associate intimacy with danger.

As a dating coach, I see this constantly. Intelligent, self-aware, capable people who deeply want connection, but unconsciously sabotage it because closeness activates old survival mechanisms.

The difficult truth is this: trauma doesn’t just affect your past. It changes how you experience relationships in the present.

 

When Healthy Feels Wrong

One of the clearest signs of unresolved relational trauma is feeling drawn to inconsistency and uncomfortable with stability.

People often assume they’re attracted to emotionally unavailable partners because of chemistry, excitement, or “passion.” But in many cases, unpredictability feels familiar to the nervous system. If love in childhood or past relationships came with anxiety, withdrawal, criticism, emotional volatility, or abandonment, then calm intimacy can feel suspicious or even suffocating.

This is why some people lose attraction when someone is kind, emotionally available and consistent. They may suddenly feel trapped, bored, overwhelmed, or emotionally numb, despite finally meeting someone healthy.

Meanwhile, emotionally unavailable people can feel intoxicating precisely because they recreate the emotional uncertainty the nervous system already recognizes.

Many people confuse emotional activation with compatibility. They are not the same thing.

Hypervigilance in Dating

Trauma also creates hypervigilance: a constant scanning for signs of rejection, betrayal, abandonment, or loss of interest.

This often looks like:

  • obsessively analyzing texting patterns
  • spiraling when someone takes longer to reply
  • reading into tone shifts or emojis
  • assuming distance means rejection
  • constantly needing reassurance
  • monitoring for “red flags” so intensely that dating becomes exhausting

People often mistake this for intuition or emotional intelligence. Sometimes it is simply a nervous system stuck in threat-detection mode.

The problem is that hypervigilance distorts perception. Trauma survivors often struggle to accurately assess danger. They may perceive threat where none exists, while simultaneously missing genuinely unhealthy dynamics because chaos feels normal to them.

This creates a painful cycle:
anxiety leads to reassurance-seeking, reassurance-seeking creates pressure, pressure pushes people away, and the eventual distancing confirms the original fear of abandonment.

The Self-Protection That Sabotages Connection

A huge amount of dating self-sabotage is actually self-protection in disguise.

People convince themselves they are being “careful,” “independent,” or “guarded,” when in reality they are avoiding vulnerability altogether.

This can look like:

  • emotionally detaching when things get serious
  • focusing excessively on flaws and incompatibilities
  • ghosting when intimacy increases
  • picking fights when connection deepens
  • cheating or flirting to maintain emotional distance
  • refusing help or support
  • never fully expressing needs
  • leaving before they can be left

Many trauma responses are unconscious attempts to avoid future pain.

If someone learned early on that vulnerability led to humiliation, rejection, neglect, manipulation, or emotional punishment, then closeness itself can feel dangerous. The nervous system begins prioritizing emotional survival over connection.

The tragic part is that these behaviors often create exactly the outcomes people fear most.

The “Independent” Trauma Response

One of the most socially rewarded trauma responses is extreme self-sufficiency.

Many people pride themselves on “not needing anyone.” They see themselves as low-maintenance, hyper-independent, or emotionally self-contained.

But healthy independence is very different from trauma-driven self-reliance.

Healthy independence allows closeness.
Trauma-based independence avoids dependence entirely.

People with this pattern often struggle to:

  • ask for support
  • receive care comfortably
  • communicate emotional needs
  • rely on partners
  • tolerate vulnerability
  • let themselves be emotionally seen

They may appear emotionally strong while secretly feeling profoundly disconnected.

Intimacy requires interdependence. Not emotional fusion, but the ability to lean on another person sometimes without feeling weak, trapped, or exposed.

The Fawn Response in Dating

Not everyone responds to trauma by withdrawing. Some respond by adapting excessively to others.

This is often called the fawn response: people-pleasing as a survival strategy.

In dating, this can look like:

  • shape-shifting to match a partner’s personality
  • suppressing opinions to avoid conflict
  • over-accommodating others
  • ignoring personal boundaries
  • prioritizing another person’s comfort over authenticity
  • becoming whoever the other person seems to want

At first, these relationships may feel unusually “easy” because there is little friction or disagreement. But over time, resentment and emotional disconnection build because the relationship is no longer based on authenticity.

You cannot build genuine intimacy while hiding yourself to maintain approval.

And unfortunately, fawning also makes people vulnerable to unhealthy relationships because they become highly tolerant of poor treatment.

Trauma and Attachment Triggers

Modern dating culture amplifies trauma responses dramatically. Dating apps create constant uncertainty, inconsistency, comparison, and ambiguity. Texting removes tone and physical reassurance. Social media intensifies scarcity mindset and fear of replacement.

For people with attachment wounds, this environment can become psychologically destabilizing.

  • A delayed reply can trigger abandonment fears.
  • Mixed signals can trigger obsession.
  • Ghosting can retraumatize rejection wounds.
  • Love bombing can feel like safety.
  • Avoidant behavior can feel magnetic.

Many people are not simply reacting to the present moment. They are reacting to accumulated emotional history. This is why one of the first exercises I do with my clients is called Relationship History.

What Healing Actually Looks Like

Healing trauma does not mean becoming perfectly calm, secure, and untriggered. It means becoming aware of your patterns before they control your behavior.

Therapy can be essential, especially for complex trauma, emotional abuse, neglect, or abusive relationships. Trauma-informed approaches like EMDR, somatic work and nervous system regulation can help people understand why their body reacts the way it does.

My coaching work is more about the behavioral side of healing:

  • learning to slow down emotionally
  • recognizing attraction to unhealthy dynamics
  • appreciating consistency instead of chasing intensity
  • communicating needs directly
  • setting boundaries earlier
  • identifying red and green flags more accurately
  • regulating anxiety without impulsive behavior
  • staying grounded instead of fantasizing or catastrophizing
  • choosing compatibility over emotional chaos
  • building emotional self-awareness in real time

The goal is not perfection. The goal is creating enough awareness and emotional regulation that trauma stops unconsciously driving your decisions.

 

The Most Important Thing to Understand

Trauma responses are not character flaws. Your nervous system adapted to experiences that overwhelmed you emotionally. Those adaptations probably protected you at some point. But survival strategies that helped in unsafe environments often create problems in healthy relationships later.

The good news is that relational patterns can change.

People can learn to tolerate intimacy without panic. They can stop confusing inconsistency with chemistry. They can become more secure, more emotionally regulated, and more capable of healthy connection.

But this usually requires something uncomfortable: staying present long enough to let healthy love feel unfamiliar without automatically running from it. That’s part of the real work. If you want to start working on it with me, fill in the form and I’ll get back to you!

Share:

How to navigate the avoidant dating culture

Even if you’re not avoidant yourself, the dating culture is, and that affects all of us in how we meet and relate, on an invisible but fundamental level.

The way we meet and date right now is something that has never existed before in human history. It’s not just the apps or social media, or the idea that “no one flirts anymore.” It’s an entirely new condition that requires us to limit our authenticity just to survive.

We all keep our expectations low and “don’t get our hopes up” to avoid disappointment. We try to delay developing feelings and avoid investing, in order to protect ourselves. The more emotionally detached you manage to be, the less likely you are to get hurt.

It’s natural to want to protect ourselves from rejection, frustration, and abandonment, especially in a culture where sudden ghosting, disappearing when things get difficult, non-commitment, and inconsistent, breadcrumb-type relationships are fully normalized.

So we minimize our needs, ask for less, avoid setting boundaries, and are afraid to speak up in case we’re labeled “too much,” accused of pressuring the other person, or told we have unrealistic expectations. This silence isn’t a choice. It’s adaptation.

We adapt to conditions that are not “natural,” and we forget what real, meaningful relationships actually look like. No, this shouldn’t push us toward idealizing the past or returning to traditional values. But we also can’t let this culture make us forget what we’re actually looking for.

It cannot be considered an achievement that we’ve adapted to a reality that disrupts our mental balance and affects our entire nervous system. We shouldn’t accept chronic anxiety and uncertainty as normal.

Yes, relationships involve risk and uncertainty, but only up to a point. The goal is emotional safety. That requires regular communication, consistency, alignment between words and actions, emotional presence and availability, and for most people, commitment and exclusivity.

These are not optional. They are the minimum required to begin building a relationship based on real connection and reciprocity, one that can withstand the challenges and difficulties that will arise. If you truly want to protect yourself from constant stress (which will eventually show up in your body), this is the baseline.

 

How to survive this culture:

If you’re emotionally available and looking for safety and calm in a relationship, instead of playing games about who texts last or who disappears first, you’re probably exhausted. Let’s look at how to navigate all this.

First, understand that building a deep and meaningful connection takes time, discernment, filtering, clarity, and alignment with your own perceptions and intuition. It doesn’t happen overnight just because you were texting until morning.

Even if dating feels discouraging, it’s important not to harden yourself. Healthy companionship is a fundamental human need and contributes to overall health and well-being. You have every right to seek it.

The solution is not to suppress your emotions or to give up on dating altogether. It’s to develop better assessment tools and deeper self-trust. When you stay connected to yourself, your intuition will show you who is right for you and who isn’t.

Stop choosing based solely on chemistry and start choosing based on capacity. Attraction is not a reliable indicator. Pay attention early on to consistency, follow-through, behavior after tension, and conflict management. Emotional availability requires emotional “infrastructure.”

When it comes to your needs, reframe “too much” as incompatibility or misalignment. Emotional depth only feels excessive in shallow containers. The right nervous system won’t experience your needs as pressure, but as valuable information.

Practice slow attachment, without emotionally withdrawing. Let the connection grow through observation, and give patterns time to emerge before deciding “this is it.” Set boundaries first with yourself, otherwise you abandon yourself. Boundaries mean you love without depleting yourself.

Build a life that fulfills you beyond dating. When romance is your only source of emotional fulfillment, it turns into an obsession and increases your tolerance for poor treatment. We need community, purpose, and internal safety so we don’t become desperate—and so we can actually discern what’s right for us.

Learn the “language” of avoidance and recognize distancing patterns such as hot-and-cold behavior, premature future promises, inconsistency, ambiguity, or intimacy without responsibility. This will help you not take rejection personally and will reduce your recovery time.

If you want help learning how to filter, set boundaries, recognize what’s worth your time and what isn’t, and recover quickly after disappointment, I can help you. Fill out the form and I’ll get in touch with you right away!

Share:

The male vs female experience on dating apps and what to do about it

the male vs the female experience on dating apps

Dating apps weren’t designed to bring us closer to love. They were designed to keep us “inside” as long as possible. They’re capitalist products, built to sell subscriptions and capture our attention, not to cure our loneliness. That means the system doesn’t really work in our favour. It plays with our FOMO, competition, and an overload of choices that don’t translate into real opportunities.

But, and this is the crucial point, the fact that the platform doesn’t work for you doesn’t mean it can’t work with the right use. To find quality connections in this environment, you need awareness, emotional maturity, and a clear strategy. The people who do the inner work, who know how to present themselves authentically and communicate without games, stand out immediately, precisely because most people don’t do any of that.

Within the system, men and women end up playing the same game with completely different rules, and they rarely understand the other side’s reality. These asymmetries aren’t personal. They’re structural. But they shape everything: who swipes, who matches, who messages, who gets overwhelmed and who gets ignored. Here’s what the research, and real lived experience, actually shows.

  1. Men face scarcity. Women face overwhelm.

Most men get very few matches. Most women get more attention than they can handle.
This is the core imbalance, and it’s backed by almost every study on online dating.

  • Men swipe more, initiate more, and face more silence.
  • Women receive more messages, more sexual content, and more harassment.

The result?

  • Men feel invisible.
  • Women feel unsafe.

These emotional realities drive the behaviours on both sides. Men cast a wide net because they get so little feedback. Women become selective because broad filters are a safety strategy, not an ego trip.

  1. Algorithms exaggerate inequality, not personality.

Apps don’t show all profiles equally. They promote the most “engaging” profiles and bury the average ones. Research (Bruch & Newman, Tinder’s own internal data) shows:

  • The top 10–20% of men receive most of the likes from women. (Specifically on Tinder, where the gender distribution divide is the biggest).
  • The average man barely gets seen.
  • Women get overexposed to a small minority of men, many of whom aren’t actually looking for a relationship.

This isn’t a moral failing on either gender. It’s a marketplace distortion that makes both sides miserable.

  1. Men swipe on possibility. Women swipe on probability.

Behaviour diverges sharply:

  • Men operate on the “why not?” principle. They swipe broadly and filter later.
  • Women operate on “give me one good reason.” They filter first and engage only when someone feels safe, interesting, or intentional.

This is why men often feel rejected before they even get started. The bar women use is higher, and for good reason: safety, emotional labour, and social cost all weigh heavier on them.

  1. Men take more risks, women take more precautions.

Studies on risk-taking (David & Cambre, 2016) show men are more inclined toward gambling-style behaviour. On apps this translates into:

  • rapid swiping
  • more experimentation
  • more willingness to initiate with strangers

Women, on the other hand, must navigate harassment, stalking risks, and security concerns. So their “selectiveness” isn’t entitlement — it’s survival.

  1. Men prioritise physical traits, women prioritise internal or socio-economic traits depending on ideology.

The Hanson (2021) findings still hold:

  • Men: appearance first, everything else second.
  • Conservative women: economic and status markers.
  • Liberal/progressive women: emotional intelligence, inner work, values alignment.

This is crucial: Progressive women aren’t looking for perfection, they’re looking for men who are emotionally literate, self-reflective, and not threatened by equality. That pool is smaller but not non-existent, and the men who do the work stand out dramatically.

  1. Both genders end up frustrated for opposite reasons.

This is the part almost nobody says plainly:

  • Men assume women have endless options, so they feel resentful or hopeless.
  • Women assume men are dangerous or unserious, so they feel guarded or exhausted.

These aren’t based on bad intentions, they’re based on the structure of the platforms themselves. The system creates unrealistic expectations, distorted perceptions, and a generalised distrust that has nothing to do with the individual person behind the profile.

So is it hopeless? No. But it is unrealistic to “just wing it.”

The people who thrive on dating apps today aren’t the hottest, richest, or youngest.
They’re the ones who understand:

  • how the system actually works
  • how the other gender experiences it
  • how to present themselves honestly but effectively
  • how to communicate with clarity, warmth, and intention
  • how to regulate their emotions so they don’t sabotage promising connections

Apps amplify both your strengths and your weaknesses.
If you don’t understand the dynamics, you miss out.

What I help people do:

This is where my work comes in, and it’s the part the apps can’t do for anyone. I help men and women:

  • Build a profile that communicates depth, uniqueness, warmth, and acts as a beacon to compatible people
  • Understand the psychology of attraction in a progressive, evidence-based way
  • Develop communication and emotional skills that create real connection
  • Navigate dating apps with strategy instead of desperation
  • Date in alignment with their values, not in reaction to trauma or scarcity
  • Break patterns that keep attracting the wrong people

The dating landscape is unequal, but it’s navigable. Dating app structure matters, but skills matter more and inner work matters most.

When people understand the reality of the system and develop the right habits, dating apps stop feeling like chaos and start becoming an opportunity. Want to work with me? Fill in the form below and I’ll get back to you!

Share:

The High-Value Man myth and the real meaning of hypergamy

If you’ve ever searched for dating advice, you’ve probably run into terms like “high-value man,” “high-value woman,” and “hypergamy.” They’re everywhere in the manosphere, and almost always presented as unquestionable truth.

But here’s the reality: these concepts are not psychology, not science, and definitely not healthy dating guidance. They’re old patriarchal narratives repackaged as modern “male self-improvement.” And if you don’t understand where they come from, you’ll end up working on the wrong things and attracting the wrong relationships.

This guide breaks down the high-value man myth, explains hypergamy in the real sociological sense, and shows why these ideas still create confusion, insecurity, and loneliness for men today.

What “High-Value Man” really means (and why it’s misleading)

The manosphere uses “high-value” like it’s a personality category. But the idea didn’t come from psychology. It came from hierarchy-obsessed, alt-right-adjacent online spaces where men are taught to rank each other and women the way one would rank products.

Here’s the actual formula behind “value” in this ideology:

  • Men: money, status, dominance, success
  • Women: youth, beauty, purity, sexual selectiveness (ideally virginity)

This isn’t personal growth.
It’s gender stereotyping dressed up as self-improvement.

Some male coaches try to soften the idea by blending it with traits like integrity, honesty, responsibility, and leadership. But the core logic hasn’t changed:
it still assumes people have unequal value depending on gender roles created 100+ years ago.

Hypergamy explained without the myths

Hypergamy, in actual sociology, describes a historical pattern:

Women tended to marry men with higher socioeconomic status because for centuries they weren’t allowed to earn money, own property, or support themselves legally.

Marriage was survival. That’s it.

But the manosphere twisted this into:

“Women want only the top 10% of men.”

That’s not hypergamy.

That’s insecurity dressed as theory.

It’s based on outdated assumptions about traditional women who relied on men economically, not modern relationships where women work, earn money, and choose partners based on emotional connection, compatibility, kindness, attraction, and shared values.

What the manosphere never mentions: Men also “date up”

The original hypergamy model always had two sides.

Men consistently choose women who are:

  • more emotionally intelligent
  • more nurturing
  • more attractive (usually above their league)
  • better communicators
  • more socially connected

In traditional marriages, women carried 100% of the emotional labor while men received care, stability, sexual access, and legacy (children carrying their name).

In other words:
Both genders “married up,” just in different domains.

But the manosphere erased the second half to blame women for male loneliness.

Why hypergamic relationships still exist today

These dynamics still survive in couples who unconsciously internalize patriarchal gender roles:

  • Women give youth, beauty, sex, caregiving and emotional labor
  • Men give status, money and protection

This is not a modern relationship model.
It’s a leftover survival strategy from a world where women had no rights.

The real question today is:

Do you actually want to live in a dynamic designed for 1850?

Most men don’t, but they’ve never been shown the alternative.

The Real Problem: Assigning relative “value” to human beings

No credible therapist, psychologist, or relationship professional uses the term “high-value man.” Ever.

Why? Because human value is non-negotiable and equal.
What varies is:

  • emotional maturity
  • compatibility
  • communication skills
  • self-awareness
  • readiness for a relationship
  • shared goals and values

It’s not about who’s “higher value.”
It’s about whether your journeys align.

This framing is healthier, more accurate, and drastically more effective in real relationships.

So What Actually Makes Someone “High-Value” in Modern Relationships?

Not money.
Not youth.
Not dominance.
Not hotness.

Emotional skills.
The ones patriarchy never taught men:

  • vulnerability
  • self-regulation
  • empathy
  • communication
  • accountability
  • the ability to give and receive emotional care.

This is what makes someone a great partner today.
This is what creates long-term, fulfilling connection.

If You’re a man struggling with dating, here’s what to do instead

You don’t need to chase status. You don’t need to become an “alpha.”

You need to work on:

  • presenting yourself authentically, not performatively
  • improving your emotional communication
  • understanding your attachment patterns
  • building genuine relational confidence
  • healing insecurities (yes, everyone has them)
  • developing clarity around your values, boundaries, and dating goals.

These are the real foundations of healthy romantic connection.

If You Want Help With This Work

This is exactly the work I do with my clients. I help men (and women) break out of outdated gender scripts and build emotionally mature, healthy, equal relationships.

If you want support in:

  • understanding your patterns
  • improving your dating confidence
  • learning effective communication
  • building a compelling dating profile
  • navigating dating apps with clarity and strategy
  • and developing the emotional skills that matter in real relationships

You can inquire about working with me. No gimmicks. No “high value” games. No unethical practices. Just real relational growth that actually leads to love.

Share:

What dating apps really have to offer

Dating apps entered our lives within the last decade. Online dating already existed through social media or dating websites (mainly in the U.S.), but apps made the whole thing far more accessible and widespread, because you literally have them in your hand all day through your phone.

What they offer us is choice. It’s like being in ten or a hundred bars every night, while sitting at home in your pajamas. That didn’t exist before. You had to seize the moment when you were out and actually make a move, otherwise you’d have to wait until next Saturday night.

Dating apps also brought what we call an intentional approach to dating, that is, the ability to date with purpose, something people have always wanted, but couldn’t easily do before on their own initiative.

You couldn’t just decide to go on a date because you felt like it; you relied on introductions through family (matchmaking), community, or church. In short, dating apps are a valuable tool, as long as you learn to use them safely, responsibly, and a little cleverly.

But it’s important to note: through apps you meet people. You don’t date them. In reality, they’re introduction apps. You meet another human being, the app simply does the introduction. “Romeo, this is Juliet. You both enjoy drinking latte and going for walks. Good luck.”

Once you’ve met the other person, whatever relationship develops between you becomes something self-standing, completely independent from the app. It’s important to understand this, because very often people find excuses for themselves and justify their behavior in app-based connections, avoiding accountability.

But really, people we meet on the apps aren’t different from people we meet elsewhere. We owe them the same level of respect we owe to anyone in “real life”.

 

Why does Gen Z seem to use dating apps less than previous generations?

First, there’s a common saying about dating apps:

“Everyone hates them but everyone’s on them.”

As for Gen Z, part of the phenomenon has to do with the world they inherited, which unfortunately isn’t the same as the one previous generations grew up in.

Repeated economic crises, the pandemic, the housing crisis, growing conservatism, the collapse of dreams and expectations, and a general sense of hopelessness about the future, all of these have contributed to what we now call the male loneliness epidemic.

These factors make this generation operate under a cloud of uncertainty, unsure whether they’ll ever live what we once called a “conventional life”, with a house, family, and children.

That can lead to a kind of resignation in the search for partners, especially among men who still identify with the traditional gender role of being the provider.

On the other hand, this generation, the dating app natives who grew up with the apps, are also in a position to reject them.

A more progressive segment doesn’t want to depend on tech giants (broligarchs), algorithms, or the AI that has now entered the dating space. They crave more authentic interactions, not mediated by technology.

(A more conservative segment, on the other hand, wants to get married at 22, with trends like “trad wife”, and some young women’s dream is to stay home baking bread and raising children),

Meanwhile, studies record “swiping fatigue”, meaning exhaustion from constant app use, from superficial connections, and from the vicious cycle of situationships that often emerge through them.

We also see a longing for something more meaningful, a nostalgia for something they never really experienced, like the “meet-cutes” of 90s romantic comedies, those magical accidental encounters in real life, that tend to disappear.

There’s a connection to social media trends like “main character energy”, seeing yourself as the protagonist of your own movie and manifesting. In a way, these are coping mechanisms for a pretty dystopian reality, where the only answer and solution seems to be magical thinking.

It all comes back to something I often tell my clients: You have to actually do something to meet new people. You can’t expect a gorgeous neighbor to knock on your door asking to borrow a cup of sugar, or to find the love of your life in your fridge. Unfortunately, life isn’t a rom-com.

If you want to learn how to use dating apps the right way, I can help you build your ideal dating profile with the right photos and a bio that represent you in the most flattering, authentic way. Fill out the form and we’ll take it from there!

Share:

How to get out of a situationship

happy couple

I often talk to women who tell me about someone they’ve met, maybe they’re in a situationship, or he’s “not ready for a relationship,” or he’s avoidant, emotionally unavailable, “doesn’t want to complicate things,” or he breadcrumbs them, offering merely crumbs of attention, texting now and then, or they spend time together and then he disappears.

And on one hand, they know that what they’re living through is emotionally draining and that they should make the decision to end it, but on the other hand, they just can’t, because the connection with him was incredible.

I completely understand. When you can talk with someone and laugh all night, and the sex is great, it feels like you have everything. It feels insane not to be in a “real” relationship together. No one else makes you feel like this. It’s amazing when you’re together, and he says he doesn’t want to lose you or what you have. So why doesn’t he want exclusivity, or to see you more often, or make it official?

One moment you tell him you’ve had enough and it’s over, and he says he’ll miss you but he understands. Then you go back to him because he messages you or you miss what you had, or you think maybe you didn’t try hard enough to show him you’re The One, and if you just give it one more chance, he’ll finally realize it or be scared enough of losing you to commit.

You have to believe me: the right person for you is never someone who isn’t ready. Connection is wonderful but it isn’t everything. It’s not enough. It has to exist alongside with readiness, with willingness and intention to build something with you. Neither is enough on its own, you need both.

And sometimes, you may need to sacrifice the sizzling spark and the dreamy connection and settle for something that feels a bit less intense, but is sure to go further, because it has the time and space to grow and evolve.

So what else is there? If you need closure, send one final message. Say you’re stepping away and you want him to respect it, and don’t look back.

It’s the right decision, even if it hurts. (And it will). But you’ll think about it one day when you’re with someone who truly chooses you, and you’ll laugh. Or rather, you won’t think about it at all.

If your story isn’t quite over yet, and you believe there’s still a chance the relationship status could change, I can help you:

  • Analyze the facts and what’s really happened between you
  • Evaluate the signs and their meaning realistically
  • Decode his messages and see what’s hidden beneath words and actions
  • Regain control of the communication with calm and confidence, without extreme reactions or impulsive moves.

It’s crucial to know where you stand and to learn to send the right message at the right time.

We don’t pressure or manipulate people, we simply project our authenticity at our best, and invite the other person to meet us there.

If there’s real potential with this person, then with the right approach, we can greatly increase the chances of something healthy unfolding. But only if it’s truly right.

If you want to give this relationship one last chance, let’s work on it together. I don’t do magic, but it’s truly magical how much things can change with emotional maturity and clear communication. Fill in the form and we’ll talk!

Share:

SOS Heartbreak: how to deal with a break-up

Irini Georgi

Menu

SOS heartbreak: how to deal with a break-up

People often reach out to me asking for urgent breakup sessions. I’m always there, because I understand.

Even a breakup after only a few months can feel deeply painful and disorienting, even for the person who chose to end it. All the more so if it was a long relationship or if you were the one who got broken up with and didn’t see it coming. The shock, the disbelief, the emptiness, it can all feel unbearable. You just want something to hold on to.

There are many things we grieve in a breakup, and we often don’t realize it:

The person themselves.
It’s natural to miss the person you shared things with, emotionally and practically. You miss the emotional safety, the feeling that someone was thinking of you, waiting for you. But you also miss the practical things: shared activities, someone to do things with, the empty side of the bed, the hug waiting for you at the end of the day. Reach out to friends and ask for both emotional and practical support.

The idea you had of that person.
Especially in short relationships, we tend to build an idealized image of the other person. Even if it wasn’t real, we still mourn the fantasy we had created. “It doesn’t matter who you actually were, I need to grieve who I thought you were.”

The expectations you had for the relationship.
Relationships are dynamic, not static. They evolve whether we want them to or not. It’s impossible not to have expectations, even when we’ve been told not to. Having expectations is part of being human, even though it’s often a source of disappointment. The person who expects nothing is either a zen master or emotionally dead.

The habits, the inside jokes, the world you built together.
That’s one of the hardest parts. Every relationship is its own little universe full of secret code that only the two of you understood. For a long time, you’ll want to share things with them that come up each day, and you won’t have anyone who truly “gets” them, because they were yours alone. For a while, try saying those things out loud as if you were telling them to your ex, explaining why they’re funny, while knowing it’s wiser not to actually reopen that wound.

The person you were with them.
Each person we love brings out a slightly different version of us. The best relationships bring out our best selves. It’s natural to miss that version of yourself, especially when comparing it to your sad, post-breakup self. (On the other hand, in bad relationships, we lose ourselves, and the breakup can feel like freedom.)

The time and effort you invested.
Humans hate losing their investments. That’s why we often stay in situations longer than we should, to avoid feeling that all the time and effort we gave it went to waste. Yes, you’ll grieve the investment, but you’ll grieve more if you stay and lose even more.

The future you won’t live together.
Every action we take creates one possible future and erases countless others. That’s life and that’s why we often wonder “what would have happened if…?” It’s natural to grieve the future you imagined, especially if it felt ideal. But that’s the trap of idealization. The goal now is to make the real future as good as possible.

The feeling that you’re starting over.
I know it hurts, and it feels like you’ll be starting from zero, but that’s not true. Every relationship teaches us something and helps us grow. You are not the same person you were before this relationship, and as time passes, you’ll see how much stronger, wiser, and more self-aware you’ve become. You’ll have more to offer and more capacity to receive next time.

To heal from a breakup, we need to face these losses head-on and allow ourselves to grieve fully. We need to notice the empty gaps and slowly fill them. Gradually, we start redefining who we are outside the relationship and reclaiming our sense of self so that we can move forward.

At the same time, we need to manage the dark thoughts that make us question our worth or our chances for happiness. Those thoughts need reframing, in order to change the story we tell ourselves.

You can get through this and you will. If you need support and tools to keep your mind steady and build the framework to move forward, I’m here for you. Fill in the form, let me know you’re going through a break-up and help will be on the way.

Share:

Apart from my TED talk, see me or listen to me speak:

See even more here

Contact

Instagram Youtube Facebook Tiktok

Book a session

© 2023 Irini Georgi

Designed by Design Process

Share:

Romance scams and how to stay safe

A growing plague in the age of online dating and dating apps is the phenomenon known as romance scams or romantic fraud. Countless people, both men and women, fall victim to these schemes worldwide, losing not only money but also the support of their loved ones out of shame for having been deceived, and, inevitably, their faith in love itself.

What exactly is a Romance Scam?
A romance scam happens when a common crook pretends to be interested in a relationship in order to gain our trust and then exploit us financially.
Perpetrators use dating apps, social media, or other messaging platforms, creating fake profiles with stolen photos and convincing personal stories.

🎭 Scammers’ Strategy

1. Creating a Persona
• They set up fake profiles with attractive photos, often stolen from real people (e.g. soldiers, models, or influencers).
• They invent sympathetic backstories — being widowed, a single parent, or working abroad or in the military — all designed to justify why they can’t meet in person.

2. Grooming & Love Bombing
They encourage you to share your struggles, then use your vulnerable, emotional moments to create a “connection,” sometimes rushing intimacy.

3. Isolation & Escalation
• They tell you not to talk to friends or family about them, saying things like “no one will understand what we have.”
• They increase emotional intensity and pressure: “I’ve never felt like this before,” “you’re my soulmate,” “I’m your other half,” “you have to trust me.”

4. The “Ask”
Everything up to this point was a setup for the main act — asking for money or some type of financial favour, under various pretenses:
• Emergency scenario: sudden illness, accident, or “I was robbed abroad.” Sometimes they initially refuse help to appear noble and earn even more trust.
• Investment/business: a “sure deal with guaranteed profit” that requires immediate participation.
• Travel plans: requests for money to buy tickets to “finally meet in person.”
• Gifts & accounts: requests for gift cards, bank details, or crypto transfers.

5. Maintaining Control
• If you start to doubt them, they guilt-trip you: “if you loved me, you’d help me.”
• They present fake documents, receipts, or even AI-generated deepfake video calls.
• They repeat cycles of affection, rupture, and reconciliation, a pattern known as intermittent reinforcement in abusive relationships, used to keep you emotionally hooked.

🚩 Warning Signs / Red Flags
• Too good to be true: The person has a perfect profile and sends overly romantic messages too soon.
• Rushed declarations of love: “I love you” and promises about the future within days or weeks.
• Avoiding meetings: There’s always an excuse.
• Inconsistencies & secrecy: “Don’t tell anyone about us yet.”
• Money: Any request for money is a bad sign, no matter how small.
• Emotional manipulation: They make you feel guilty, rushed, or responsible for their wellbeing.

🛡️ How to Protect Yourself
• Check their photos with a reverse image search (though this is becoming less effective with AI-generated images).
• Don’t let the relationship progress too quickly.
• Talk to friends and/or family to get an outside opinion.
• Never send money or personal information to someone you haven’t met in person.
• Trust your instincts. If something feels “off,” your intuition is usually right.

 

Share: