Irini Georgi

Why are so many men obsessed with beautiful women?

It seems obvious, but it’s not what you think. Everyone is attracted to beauty, but for many men, the pursuit of the most beautiful woman becomes an obsession. Let’s explore why.

Symbol

For many men, a beautiful woman isn’t just attractive. She’s a symbol. She symbolizes that they’ve “made it” in life. That’s why we talk about the “trophy woman.” It’s not about the woman, it’s about the man. Men who choose women solely based on appearance have learned to evaluate themselves through their success.

 Self-Esteem

We’re talking about performance-based self-esteem. When someone’s self-worth is built solely on performance (professional, social, sexual), then their choices are often filtered through what enhances that image, in order for them to feel like they’re enough.

Social Validation – Demands of Stereotypical Masculinity

A beautiful partner isn’t just a romantic choice, she’s social validation. It’s the male version of “what will people say.” What will other men say? How much will they admire me, envy me, respect me? How well will I prove that I’m man enough and that I’ve succeeded?

Disappointment

And yet, choosing the most beautiful woman they can “get” often creates anxiety, fear of rejection, and a deep sense of inadequacy. Later on, it leads to loneliness and unhappiness, because the relationship is based on external variables, not substance. They choose women with whom the relationship lacks depth, but they don’t allow themselves other criteria, because society demands this of them.

Patriarchy

This entire structure rests on patriarchal foundations. Because in patriarchy, a woman’s value is tied to her appearance, and a man’s to his earning power. Relationships become transactions. These beliefs are still passed down by fathers and reinforced by society, so boys grow up believing that only this formula will earn them approval and happiness. But that’s a lie.

If you’re a man and this resonates, ask yourself:

What does it mean to me to have a beautiful partner?
How does it affect the image I have of myself?

  • What am I afraid will happen if I choose a woman based on other traits, like character, compatibility, emotional connection, instead of looks?

  • How do I feel when I’m next to a very beautiful woman? Do I feel fear, self-doubt, or a need to prove something?

  • How is my value as a man tied to the woman I have next to me?

  • If I couldn’t rely on looks to choose a partner, what other qualities would be important to me?

These questions will help bring you closer to your true desires, beyond the stereotypes, and give you a trusted guide so you can track, find and pick the right partner for your authentic self.

Share:

How did the manosphere become so popular?

Between the panic that all incels will turn into femicide perpetrators and the humor offered by alpha male influencers, let’s take a moment to understand why this is happening.

The global rise of feminism through pop culture and social media opened doors for many women’s communities. Women found empowerment spaces, gained platforms to speak, and for the first time, the world was (somewhat) paying attention. And the general message was “men are trash” for reasons we all know (which of course doesn’t mean all men, or that they are actually trash). But many men started feeling targeted.

Even worse, they felt marginalized. The manosphere was never made for handsome, wealthy men, but for the underprivileged—those who felt excluded from the dating scene (basically from sex), from relationships, and from love. For men who are poor and considered unattractive, and who are mostly not highly educated, it seemed like some kind of solution.

These men may have experienced rejection or even contempt from women in their lives, and haven’t processed the pain. Many may not have even dared make a move toward women, because they lack basic social skills. According to manosphere advice, all one needs is confidence, to lightly insult the woman, and to speak in riddles—then you can get any woman into bed.

These underprivileged men have been experiencing what’s been called the “male loneliness epidemic” for years. And they’re suffering. They needed someone to listen to their problems, someone to speak to them, when Hollywood, flashy influencers, and mainstream culture left them out. They needed guidance. There was a huge gap in the market.

And it didn’t take long for something to fill it. It started in gaming forums, and then expanded to other forums (4chan, Reddit), where they shared experiences, thoughts, and feelings—and this was genuinely positive, because many young men who had lived in social isolation finally gained a sense of community. They needed support—and they found it.

With the rise of video content, some figures stood out and became influencers. Some, like fitness influencers, pivoted into this niche because it was so lucrative. That’s how we got people like Jordan Peterson, who came with the seal of academic legitimacy (though he’s now been cast out of the academic community). He sensed the market demand for male role models and pseudo-scientific authority, exploited it, and became famous.

The problem is, instead of identifying the real enemy behind male oppression—which is The System, specifically Capitalism and Patriarchy (and White Supremacy)—they decided their enemy was feminism. In a distortion of reality, they use feminist arguments to convince their audience that men are victims of feminism. They quote stats on suicide, depression, addiction, etc., as proof. But they refuse to see that it’s patriarchy, the man-box, and the demands of stereotypical masculinity that are to blame.

They don’t blame patriarchy—because that would mean relinquishing privilege and comfort. So it’s more convenient to blame women and feminism. Why? Because feminism gave women the ability to survive without marrying, and the choice to not pair up with men they don’t like—in other words, not with them, the men who believe access to sex should be their right. So, feminism, and anything progressive, is the enemy.

And because a return to “traditional values” implies conservatism, all of this became embedded in alt-right rhetoric (which is not “alt” at all, but far-right). It became a package deal. While the manosphere crowd believes it’s unfair to have to pay for a woman’s coffee if they manage to get a date, at the same time they want right-wing politics and hate woke culture.

They don’t see the truth. And it’s ironic and tragic that they see as an enemy the very movement that is actually on their side—the movement that could genuinely improve their lives. Not by offering them sex. But by offering collective healing tools that could make relationships with women possible.

History of the Manosphere

It began in the early 2000s as a collection of blogs, forums, and YouTube channels focused on men’s issues. At some point, it started to function as a counter-movement to feminism.
The term “manosphere” emerged around 2009–2010 to describe the online ecosystem where these ideas developed.

Its foundations were built on older men’s movements, like the Men’s Rights Movement (MRM) from the 1970s–80s, which focused on divorce, child custody, and false rape accusations.

2000s–2010s:
Pickup Artists (PUA) led by gurus like Neil Strauss with his book “The Game”, which taught men how to “seduce” women—basically by saying things like “I like you, even though you’re a bit chubby” to get them into bed.

Mid-2010s:
The rise of Red Pill ideology (named after The Matrix), promoting the idea that men must “wake up” and realize that women actually hold power in society, while being inferior, dirty, immoral, etc.

2016–present:
Incels—the evolution of Red Pill thinking. Men who hate women and feminism for denying them access to sex.

MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way):
Men who completely give up on the idea of relationships.

Connections to the far-right, white supremacy, anti-LGBTQ, and anti-woke rhetoric grow.
We see the rise of the “hustler” ideal through crypto culture—the man who makes loads of money and has as many women as he wants, using and exploiting them like objects. (See: Andrew Tate.)

Core Beliefs:

  • Biological determinism: Gender roles are biologically predetermined, and it’s foolish to try to escape them.
  • Men as victims: Men are the oppressed ones; we live under matriarchy; feminism is misandry and “feminazism.”
  • Cheap self-improvement: At the beginning, there was talk about self-care, confidence, and fitness—but misogyny got way more views. Over time, self-improvement shifted from a process of inner growth and healing into a performance of dominance and control. Instead of fostering emotional maturity, it became a show—a curated display of masculinity, power, and “social value.”
  • Monetization: Enter hustler culture, with millions of desperate men paying for subscriptions to ridiculous “gurus” offering seminars on how to get women or make money—naturally, with little to no real results. The promise was always the same: quick success, sex, power. The reality? Usually full of disappointment and burnout.

Impact

  • Connection to violence: Incels who went out and shot people (e.g., Elliot Rodger, 2014).
  • Platform bans: Reddit, YouTube, and Facebook started limiting manosphere content (2018–2020), but TikTok let them run wild for far too long. In 2022, Andrew Tate was banned, but he remains a legend, with countless others trying to take his place.
  • Legacy: There are still online corners where the manosphere thrives, but it’s no longer quite as “cool.” The “gym bro podcasts” are everywhere, but they’ve become meme-worthy. The slightly more polished successors of this ideology have shifted to life coaching and dating coaching, always with an emphasis on confidence—but still rooted in the same old worldview.
Share:

The truth about incels

A modern feminist approach challenging the narrative & creating change

Incels are often seen as villains in many feminist circles. They are the enemy, just like feminism is their enemy. But there should be no war at all. In reality, the vast majority of men who identify as incels aren’t mass murderers but depressed, isolated and underprivileged men who harm themselves more so than others. Feminism ought to stand by their side, because feminism should mean empathy and solidarity.

The problem

Incels perceive themselves as having lower value as romantic or sexual partners than other men. They place excessive importance on physical attractiveness and financial prospects to attract women, and underestimate women’s preferences for intelligence, kindness and humour. Incels’ inaccurate perception of what women desire in partnerships, leads to blaming women as well as other men for their lack of romantic success.

The role of dating apps

Rejection on dating apps amplifies their beliefs, with adverse consequences on their mental health. They create a distorted self-perception with low self-esteem, develop maladaptive coping mechanisms, and avoid accountability for their actions. By projecting their insecurities onto external reality, they reinforce patriarchal values and dehumanize the women they seek to date, further reducing their chances of romantic success.

A vicious cycle

Rejection sensitivity refers to an individual’s heightened and often anxious response to the perceived possibility of rejection or social exclusion. It seems that in rejecting themselves and believing they will not be good enough for potential partners, incels believe everyone else will agree. This may contribute to self-isolation and hostile behaviour, making them more dismissive of others and resulting in an unfortunate self-fulfilling prophecy.

The solution

It’s time to stop blaming incels and start blaming the society that raised them. Unlearning harmful anti-feminist ideals and seeking education on women’s lived experiences, is the start. Learning to cultivate trust in humanity, building one’s self-esteem with deep work, by seeking social and mental health support and recognizing that romantic relationships are possible for everyone, is the key to creating meaningful change.

My work is to help and guide men through the path of escaping maladaptive thinking and behaviour patterns that harm them and their possibilities of forming healthy relationships. I can help men redefine their ideas of masculinity and femininity and understand the female experience. Understanding leads to empathy and empathy leads to connection, which is marks the start of relationships. Let me be part of your journey and guide you through. It’s time for change!

Share:

Men & Vulnerability

A challenge for men

Vulnerability has become the new buzzword in relationships, much like “empathy” was a few years ago. Since women overwhelmingly seek therapy and counselling to explore and understand their emotional inner worlds, there’s growing pressure on men to evolve emotionally to avoid being left behind.

However, this request often falls flat. While men may desire the courage to embrace vulnerability, as it sounds promising, they often grapple with internal resistance or societal expectations of masculinity. Traditionally, vulnerability suggests weakness, and it’s defined as being exposed to the possibility of physical or emotional harm.

Historically, male roles centered around strength, protection, and provision. Being asked to show vulnerability can feel like a threat, clashing with ingrained narratives of masculinity that discourage anything perceived as weakness. Failing to meet these standards often triggers fears of rejection and social exclusion.

Survival strategies from prehistoric times taught men to assess each other for weaknesses, as any sign of frailty was seen as a liability to the group. Such men were undervalued as partners and were in risk of losing social standing. This evolutionary instinct still prompts men to conceal any perceived vulnerabilities.

Brené Brown, known for her research on shame, redefines vulnerability as uncertainty, risk, and emotional exposure. Her perspective reveals the courage required to engage in vulnerable acts. Demonstrating bravery garners respect and admiration, not just from other men but also from potential partners, aligning with cultural “warrior” archetypes found in myths worldwide.

Today, many developed societies enjoy unprecedented physical safety, diminishing the need for male protection. Ironically, men now feel inherently vulnerable because the traditional protector role is less relevant. The diminished need for male protection challenges their sense of value and purpose, sparking a broader identity crisis.

Men’s existential need to be needed is significant and documented. Studies in the U.S. show that messages like “No one needs me” and “I’m worthless” are common themes in men’s suicide notes. Women’s economic independence has also shifted traditional dynamics, reducing men’s role as providers. Adjusting to this cultural shift in just a few generations is no easy feat.

Vulnerability is often misunderstood as merely expressing deep emotions, but it encompasses much more: asking for what you want, setting boundaries, requesting help, trying new things despite the risk of failure, and approaching a potential partner with the possibility of rejection.

In essence, vulnerability surfaces whenever our identity faces potential challenge or risk.

 

The value of vulnerability in relationships

In intimate relationships, vulnerability fosters closeness, a vital element for healthy connections. Sharing your truth invites genuine connection and builds trust. Revealing our authentic selves signals that we have nothing to hide and pose no threat.

People often conceal their truth in order to maintain a sense of control and security, avoiding discomfort. Healthy vulnerability requires discernment—knowing what to share, with whom, and when. It’s part of personal growth, pushing us beyond our comfort zones to explore new possibilities. Without venturing into the unknown, we miss opportunities for transformation.

Vulnerability demands courage—to face fears and take leaps of faith without guaranteed safety. While falling flat on our face and failing are very real, possibilities, each attempt teaches resilience and flexibility, making future challenges less daunting.

 

Can men be vulnerable and attractive?

There’s no universal answer, as women’s preferences vary based on upbringing, culture, trauma, and personal experiences. However, one general principle holds: vulnerability expressed from a weakened, self-deprecating place often feels uncomfortable for women. If a weeping man appears unable to care for himself, let alone his partner, it can be unsettling for a woman.

On the contrary, vulnerability is attractive when it stems from a man’s empowered self. When men accept themselves and strive for growth without seeking validation, they display strength—even in tears. This form of vulnerability isn’t weakness but courage: revealing imperfections without collapsing or begging for approval.

True vulnerability is an act of bravery, a willingness to take risks despite insecurity. By embracing this mindset, relationships can flourish, allowing deeper, more meaningful connections. Without such openness, relationships risk stagnation, becoming dry and unfulfilling.

Emotional closeness is the essence, the magical elixir that reveals the other person in their multi-layered wholeness and helps keep the relationship alive.

Vulnerability isn’t easy, but that’s its nature. Men can choose to remain attached to outdated standards of masculinity or become part of the new generation of men who opt for equal, mutual, and authentic relationships.

 

Share:

The truth about the bear dilemma

bear dilemma barbie

The truth about the bear dilemma

So much has been written about the bear debate, and yet the conversation kept on, fuelled by men’s reactions. Why is it that so many men find it impossible to believe that this conversation is even happening?

Men who use all caps on social media, mad with frustration:

“But bears are dangerous! How can you not understand that? They can kill you! Why would you choose to be alone in the forest with a bear instead of a man?”

The answer is “so that you wonder why”. So that you ask yourself why. Because it’s a question that needs to be asked—and more importantly, reflected upon.

Why would a woman say such a thing? Could something else be at play, rather than the naive belief that bears are cuddly like Winnie the Pooh or fluffy plush toys? Could it be that this conversation isn’t about bears at all, but about men?

Could this be a sequel of the #MeToo movement, which, after the rejection of Harvey Weinstein’s conviction (because there were “too many” victims), didn’t achieve what it had promised?

Maybe the conversation that #MeToo started needed to go on, and a bear just happened to be passing by. The hero we didn’t know we needed.

Of course, those who react to the bear issue believe #MeToo had gone too far. On this, there’s a quote from a Guardian article on the #MeToo’s aftermath following Weinstein’s overturned conviction and the [then] likelihood of Trump’s return to the presidency. It says:

“The only thing that’s gone too far about MeToo, is the hypocrisy of suggesting it’s gone far enough.”

The bear was just a means to an end. Hopefully, we’ll find new means every so often, to keep the conversation going.

The bear memes are endless but the arguments supporting the bear choice are clear:

  • Because the bear will recognize I’m human and probably won’t bother me if I don’t bother it.
  • Because bears rarely attack humans, unlike men.
  • Because everyone will believe me if I say a bear attacked me.
  • Because no one will ask what I was wearing if a bear attacks me.
  • Because no one will ask if I’d been drinking if a bear attacks me.
  • Because no one will ask if I “led it on” if a bear attacks me.
  • Because no one will ask if I mentioned having a boyfriend if a bear attacks me.
  • Because no one will ask if I’d had a past relationship with the bear if it attacks me.
  • Because no one will say I was “asking for it” if a bear attacks me.
  • Because no one will ask if I screamed for help when the bear attacked.
  • Because no one will ask if I fought back enough against the bear.
  • Because no one will ask if I tried to reject the bear politely.
  • Because no one will question if I was too polite, making it seem like I consented.
  • Because the bear won’t violate my corpse after killing me.
  • Because no one will say, “Impossible, I know that bear, it’s a nice guy.”
  • Because the bear won’t say, “Serves you right for choosing a man over me.”

All these arguments make perfect sense in our society, where rape culture is the norm. But this isn’t about bears.

The arguments about the bear are really about men. And this conversation will remain relevant as long as people react so strongly. If one in three women had been attacked by a bear, no one would deny there’s a problem. But the conversation isn’t about bears.

If you’re a man, don’t focus on the bear. Look at yourself. Look around you—your friends, your conversations, the “locker room talk”. Reflect on what you’ve said or done in the past. Consider what you’re saying and doing today. How much safety do you inspire? How are you contributing to making the world safer for women?

Don’t look at the bear. Look at the forest.

Don’t look at the bear. Look at yourself.

 

Share:

Apart from my TED talk, see me or listen to me speak:

See even more here

Book a session

© 2023 Irini Georgi

Share:

Taylor Swift, dating, politics & cats

Taylor Swift’s proud self-identification as a “childless cat lady” in a post supporting Kamala Harris over Donald Trump, is both a sign of the times and a milestone.

Women are becoming more politically engaged than ever, on a global scale, and increasingly progressive, as they finally realize that the personal is political and that their hard-won rights, achieved through pain and struggle, are never entirely secure.

The Economist’s article “The Growing Gulf Between Young Men and Women” describes the phenomenon of the political gap between young men and women.

Even though for the incredibly beautiful and wealthy Taylor Swift, the statement is neither brave nor risky, but provocatively and defiantly ironic, it signifies the official reclamation of the term “cat lady”. It opens the door for every woman to embrace it fearlessly because, for many, it’s the best possible alternative.

Every day, there are men who tell women who dare to deviate from societal stereotypes and expectations—or who simply refuse to stay silent—sarcastic and mocking remarks like, “you’ll end up alone with your cats.” Perhaps it’s time they rethink this “joke” and start wondering why women are choosing cats (or dogs or succulents) over the available men.

The era of women feeling ashamed for being alone with their cats is over. It is now a conscious choice. They evaluate the men available and choose to stay out of the game.

So let’s reconsider the cat-lady stereotype and whom it really insults. Because for women—who, throughout history, could never freely make this choice—it is an earned victory.

  • When you gain education, you reject people who deny science and those who are racist, homophobic, intolerant, and bigoted.
  • When you read more, travel, and broaden your mind, you may reject organized religion and the Church.
  • When you work and become financially independent, you reject men whose only offer is financial support.
  • When you develop class consciousness, you reject conservatives and far-right ideologies.
  • When you undergo feminist awakening, you reject misogynists and sexists—even benevolent ones—because you want to be seen as an equal human being, not a delicate flower or an ethereal creature.
  • When you learn about healthy relationships and what constitutes abuse, you reject controlling, jealous partners who try to dictate your life and mould you into what they want.
  • When you go through therapy, you reject emotionally unavailable partners—or at least you stop torturing yourself trying to make such relationships work. You stop telling yourself you can survive on crumbs. You want it all or nothing.

And sometimes, you end up alone. But this solitude is hard-earned. It is costly and precious, even if it hurts. However, you might have a soft, purring kitty in your lap.

 

Share:

Apart from my TED talk, see me or listen to me speak:

See even more here

Book a session

© 2023 Irini Georgi

Share:

Positive Masculinity

The term “toxic masculinity,” used in public discourse over the past few years to describe problematic expressions of stereotypical masculinity, is toxic in itself.

We don’t want to tell men that masculinity is toxic. We want to tell men that many of the ways they were taught to act and things they were taught to do to prove they are men, are problematic. They don’t need to prove their masculinity to anyone. It’s undeniable. There’s no need for a “masculinity meter.”

We often talk about redefining male identity, free from patriarchal stereotypes. A male identity that is not inherently tied to believing that femininity is inferior. Masculinity free of misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, or violence. Masculinity where vulnerability and the full spectrum of emotions are allowed, not just anger.

Yes, true masculinity—free from patriarchal demands—is closer to femininity than we’ve been raised to believe, but it still has differences. Positive masculinity is courage, bravery, a protective instinct, kindness, fatherhood, calculated risk-taking, and the pursuit of resources and creating for the benefit of family and society.

From a biological determinism and evolutionary perspective, yes, men have evolved to source and produce more resources than they need, to ensure survival for others. Movements like the Manosphere and MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) are contrary to their nature.

To find meaning and purpose, men need to feel needed.

In this era of the male loneliness “epidemic”, as documented by global statistics, the most common words written in the notes of men who took their own lives were “useless” and “worthless.” Feeling needed is a fundamental aspect of masculinity and crucial for men to feel they belong in society.

Men need meaningful relationships in their lives—with women and other men. Traditionally, they’ve relied on women to handle relationships while they were just “there,” never learning how to create and nurture these connections.

Now that women live independently, single men experiencing the economic crisis are becoming isolated, turning to numbing coping mechanisms like gaming, pornography, and substance abuse. They feel lost and they let their lives go to waste. This affects millions of young men and harms society as a whole.

We need to stop blaming men and recognize that the societal expectations from them have changed so drastically and rapidly in the last decades, that many of them couldn’t adapt.

They were raised for a role that no longer exists. Now, they must create a new role for themselves, find their place in society, and learn things they were never taught—starting with emotions and meaningful relationships. Because both society and women, we need good men.

Note 1:

“Positive masculinity” is not a formal term. Just as we’ve grown used to negatively labelling masculinity, we now need positive descriptors, images, and examples of it. If masculinity could embody these traits, we’d live in a safer world for all.

Dividing human traits into “male” and “female” categories was a huge mistake. Women have been allowed to adopt “male” traits, but men are forbidden from adopting “female” ones, leaving them broken. This concept is inspired by relational therapist Terry Real, one of the first to discuss stereotypical masculinity and patriarchy, and its damaging role in relationships.

Note 2:

Public discourse on these issues is gradually changing, requiring a modern perspective. When I started talking about rape culture, in 2016, I realized the end goal shouldn’t be to educate women, but men. Until then, this was seen as a “women’s issue.”

Jackson Katz’s work gave me the authority to say, “This is a men’s issue,” because he, a man, had said it first about male violence. We need to talk to men. Even if they’re not to blame, they must take responsibility for fixing what’s broken. They need to speak to other men and serve as positive role models.

Men also need empowerment, though this may sound absurd to the primary victims of patriarchy—women. But this is now a reality. There are countless organizations, movements, and content empowering women, but for men, there are only alpha male influencers and alt-right misogynistic rhetoric.

These are the only voices engaging with men, worsening the situation. Many men feel hated for existing. They’re not pursuing education, they’ve lost their hopes of high earning careers, and they are vulnerable, isolated, and lost, especially after economic crises. Yes, they’re vulnerable—they’re committing suicide at alarming rates.

It’s not any woman’s job or responsibility to fix this. But society has to and we need to be talking about it. I coach women who want to connect with men, and right now, these men are what’s out there. We have to find solutions.

 

Share:

What is feminist dating?

What is feminist dating?

The term “feminist dating” is a bit cringe, I know, but it’s only temporary. Because dating needs updating. As we know it, it’s old-fashioned, archaic and problematic, based on ideas and ideals of the past.

 

A little of the 1800s, where the man had to be a gentleman and the woman a “lady”. A little of the 1950s, with the man being a provider and the woman a virgin and home maker, a little of the 70s sexual liberation, meaning sex before marriage is allowed, but women can’t have a body count over 5 or they are cheap sluts. A little of the 80s and 90s, when we read on women’s magazines “10 ways to drive him wild in bed” -just the man, because female pleasure was too complicated and the clitoris a mythical organ like the horn of a unicorn, and on top of that, you’d better fake an orgasm to look cool and make the man feel good. At the same time, we had the idea that women are supposed to play hard to get, so no means yes, so out of the window goes consent.

 

Add a dash of porn culture, where abuse becomes the norm, and throw it all in the dating apps mixing bowl. The cocktail is toxic. That’s why I decided to write a book and start a movement redefining dating between men and women, so that it’s healthy, fun, equal and mutually pleasurable. Feminist dating is the dating you want, even if you still haven’t come to terms with the word “feminism”.

Share:

Apart from my TED talk, see me or listen to me speak:

See even more here

Book a session

© 2023 Irini Georgi

Share:

How to avoid the Friendzone

Friendzone

How to avoid the Friendzone

Feminism rejects the friend zone concept and rightly so, as it’s used by men who pretend they want to be friends with women they are attracted to, in order to enter their circle, gain their trust, wait until they’re feeling vulnerable and then try to get them to have sex with them. This is lying, manipulation, betrayal and, of course, misogyny. I’m not talking about this. What I am talking about, is the accidental friend zone, when you didn’t take action and show initiative early on, and then you find the momentum is gone. That said, here’s my advice.

1. Start as you mean to go on

Yes, it’s scary and you risk rejection, but you need to communicate your romantic interest sooner rather than later. This can help avoid misunderstandings and mixed signals, and show her you’re not just looking for friendship.

 2. Be clear but not creepy

Don’t stop being friendly and smiley, many men turn creepy when they want to express interest. Build a special connection, flirt, be funny, compliment her or, even better, tease her lovingly (meaning without impacting her self-confidence, it’s called benevolent teasing). Ask her out making sure she understands it will just be the two of you.

3. State your intentions

Expressing your feelings directly is the ultimate challenge. If you want to minimize the risk, try asking “have you ever wondered what we’d be like as a couple?” or say you had a dream that you two were kissing. You’ll judge if it’s a good idea to proceed by her reaction.

4. Respect her decision

If she doesn’t feel the same way about you, you have to accept her choice and respect her boundaries. You can do this by giving her space and focusing on yourself, on your hobbies, or meeting new people.

5. Time to move on

If you have feelings for someone, it’s very hard to stay away from them, especially if they seek out your company. But remember, if you like them romantically, it’s not friendship. You’ll be torturing yourself if you try to remain friends, and it will keep getting worse. Do yourself a favour and move on.

Share:

Apart from my TED talk, see me or listen to me speak:

See even more here

Book a session

© 2023 Irini Georgi

Share:

Dangerous masculinity role models

Toxic masculinity

Dangerous masculinity role models

I have made it my life’s mission to talk to men about feminism. It’s not that easy, though. You see, men don’t listen to women, especially women who talk to them about feminism. The problem is that men listen to other men. And you know what kind of men talk to other men? Let me tell you.

You probably know Jordan Peterson. The handsome silver fox who in another life we might have called daddy, who is clever and charismatic, and used to sort of make sense, even though he was terribly selective in the research he used to support his arguments. He just loves to talk about the biological differences of the sexes and how different men and women’s nature is, you know, the usual kind of stuff boomers say, but in the last few years, I almost worry about him. (I mean, even the best of us are in therapy to resolve issues with our mother and grandmother, and even the best of us cry all the time, but I don’t cry that much in front of the camera even when I talk about the hundreds of rape stories women have confided in me).

I don’t know if Peterson really lost it or if he’s doing it because every time he cries on camera he wipes away his tears with hundred dollar bills or for a completely different reason. I suspect he may be in the category of those who started their online career relatively modestly, and gradually became radicalized by their own audience. Yes, radicalization doesn’t just happen from the creator to the audience, it also happens the other way round and it’s a very interesting phenomenon that to a small degree, happened to me too. (To the left, to the left).

In the manosphere, in particular, many started out as, say, fitness coaches talking about squats and protein, and because of the public’s thirst for edgy content, they turned it into misogyny, alt-rightism, and machismo.

All the way to the dystopia of Andrew Tate. Who openly told young men to rape women to put them in their place, and the man wasn’t just talk, he practiced what he preached, he even had a trafficking gig. Talk about authenticity, living the criminal dream.

Tate was hugely influential but no longer exists on the internet. He had been cut from all social media except for a brief reappearance on Twitter, in which, thanks to the genius of Elon Musk, his account had been reinstated, but enter Greta Thunberg as a goddess ex machina, and he was sent to prison.

The thing is, Tate was just the tip of the iceberg. There are thousands of neophytes out there who want to be Tate in Tate’s place, and they’re doing everything they can to make it happen, because they know there’s a gap in the market and they are aching to fill the hole.

Tiktok is filled with would-be Taters (I don’t know if the word exists), telling fifteen-year-olds to be “real men”, to take steroids to get big, to stop whining, to stop acting like little bitches, to learn how to make money online, (probably by scamming 12-year-olds), to invest in crypto, and if they are in their twenties, they are worthless if they don’t have a lambo. A Lamborghini. In their twenties. In this economy.

Taters pop up on social media like dick pics in the dms of girls with pics in a bikini, and they constantly talk about what it means to be a man, which in their worldview is to be a gym bro, make tons of money, not talk about feelings and other simp stuff like that, be angry all the time and view women as holes, unless it’s time to procreate. (Even then, women won’t be real people, but household sex robots who cook, clean and provide sex and care).

Taters become pop sensations who actually influence millions of teenage boys who see a video first, and then another pops up on their feed, and another, and another, until they believe it all and adjust their idea of reality through the distorted filter of what we call problematic masculinity.

Men, especially young men, are in dire need of guidance. They are desperate for guidance from almost anyone to help them make sense of a changing world, a world where what they were taught as children, no longer seems to apply. They lived through the MeToo movement and saw women angry, and their immediate reaction was “not all men”, meaning defensive or passive aggressive, but that’s not enough anymore. They are becoming openly aggressive.

How dare women be angry when it’s them who have all the privilege? The whole world tries to take care of them and protect them, how many women have you seen doing manual labor in a blue-collar job? They don’t have to go to war and they get saved first if the ship goes down.

But worst of all, these dirty hoes deprive Good Guys of sex, since none of them agree to have sex with me. By what right, you b*tch, do you say no to a Good Guy?

And they talk a load of nonsense about “patriarchy”, as if it’s not them who have the upper hand and have turned men to beta subs. They talk about “rape culture” as if we don’t all condemn true rapists, they say they don’t like wolf-whistles, then why did you wear that skirt you slut? To top it all, they say genders are more than two, all that woke bullshit, libtard feminazis, that’s what they are.

They say masculinity is “toxic” and they pretend they’re into dudes you can’t really call men, sissies, pussies, simps and beta males, who talk about their feelings and cry like little girls, all soft and weak, who will never be real men.

Because real men aren’t like that. They are tough. Strong. Powerful. Dominating. They don’t need to talk much. They’re alphas. These are the kind of men who win at life. Everything else is lies and propaganda, for a new order of things where men will lose their hard-earned rights and will be emasculated in childhood, growing up like girls, lest they express their true male biological nature. Whatever woke crap they try to sell us, is part of their Plan to feminize men, and the real man must resist”.

And resist they do. They resist by turning to neo-conservatism, i.e. alt-rightism, i.e. the far right, and misogyny. They desperately seek to belong and feel like they fit in a society that is changing at a swift pace, and where progressives laugh in their faces and call them uneducated fools. All they have left is hatred and resistance to anything progressive. They in turn mock and curse progressivism, because it is the only way to exorcise their fear and the threat that no one needs who they are anymore, no one needs what they were taught to be. Because the masculinity they think is pure and authentic, is an insidious social construct.

The trend is ubiquitous. The amount of misogynistic comments I get on Tiktok is heartbreaking. I do find them interesting, from an anthropological and sociological point of view, but what saddens me is that we could talk about so much more complex concepts, like analyze Barbie and beauty culture from a post-feminist and capitalist point of view, or redefine masculinity and deconstruct the male experience at a time when the delusion of patriarchy as a logical structure of society is being shaken to the core. But no. Still, after all this cultural shift, mentioning the word “femicide” or saying that a joke might be sexist makes you a feminazi. Honestly, I miss the dialogue we could be having.

Masculinity is in crisis and we don’t have enough positive role models of evolved masculinity. Modern masculinity. You know what we have? We have Bedros Keuilian. A pumped up Russian-American entrepreneur who has built an empire based on men’s need to belong, and to regain a sense that the masculinity they know still has value. Keuilian offers many services, he is also the writer of a book called “Man Up”, but the most infamous of all is the Modern Day Knight Project, which trust me, has nothing to do with romance or magic.

The MDK Project is a 75-hour bootcamp for the ultimate alpha male. Keuilian says “some would call it torture, but I call it opportunity”. Men go and pay money to have some ex-military dudes with muscles and cigars force them to roll in mud for three days, (we’re talking lots of mud), on wires and rocks, to hike up mountains loaded with gear, roll in mud again for long distances, while they are being bullied, screamed at and put through frat style hazing. They don’t let them sleep, they make them do drills that simulate Navy Seals’ Hell Week (that none of them have trained for), they nearly waterboard them, and even make them dig their own graves and lie in them until they nearly suffocate. A man died the 5th time the program ran. Of course, everyone has signed a liability waiver.

Do you know how much they pay for the privilege of doing the MDK project? Eighteen thousand dollars ($18,000).

If I wanted to laugh I’d say that’s the gayest cry for help I’ve ever seen, paying to be soaking wet for three days lying in ditches next to other sweaty men, that’s the only horse shoe theory I can subscribe to, because otherwise you’re better off paying a dominatrix to put you through this, it will be cheaper and in the end you could have sex if you want, but I don’t think you care about that at all.

But it’s not funny. What is the least funny of all, is that they have also created the Squire program for teenage boys, from 13-14 years old. They send the boys along with the fathers, so that the boys can become “men”. (Because normal childhood trauma isn’t enough, so let’s add some more for good measure).

In fact, the benefits of the program include “he will no longer behave like a child”. The narrative is chillingly accurate from the opposite side of our worldview. It’s that society wants boys to be weak and soft and that Hollywood portrays the male ideal of the submissive loser, so you need to protect your son from the feminization they want.

“They” refers to us who want kids to be kids. “They” refers to us who want men to be whole humans. Because patriarchy has drawn a vertical line down the human condition, and has decided on this side are the masculine traits: strength, protection, power, logic, and on this side the feminine: sweetness, care, communication, emotion. But women are allowed to borrow a bit from the masculine side, because for a woman, aspiring to be more like a man is positive, while for a man, wanting anything to do with femininity is shameful.

The point is not to be a man in touch with “your feminine side”. There is no feminine and masculine side. The point is to be whole humans, to live the full spectrum of humanity, or we condemn ourselves to self-mutilation and life in the prison of patriarchy. Stereotypical masculinity wants men to live half lives.

We have to protect our boys. Girls may be at risk from the beauty standards of Instagram and Tiktok and from the oligarchy of expected femininity, but boys are at risk of losing their very humanity at the altar of masculinity.

Share:

Apart from my TED talk, see me or listen to me speak:

See even more here

Book a session

© 2023 Irini Georgi

Share: